Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Repatriation Commission v Swinden [2001] FCA 1147
V 619 of 1999 REPATRIATION COMMISSION v LEONARD BUTTELL SWINDEN RYAN J 20 AUGUST 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 619 of 1999
ON APPEAL FROM THE VETERANS' APPEALS DIVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Applicant
AND: LEONARD BUTTELL SWINDEN
Respondent
JUDGE: RYAN J
DATE OF ORDER: 20 AUGUST 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be allowed. 2. The decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("the Tribunal") of 12 October 1999 be set aside. 3. The matter be remitted to the Tribunal to be heard and determined according to law. 4. There be no order as to the costs of the application to this Court.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 619 of 1999
ON APPEAL FROM THE VETERANS' APPEALS DIVISION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Applicant
AND: LEONARD BUTTELL SWINDEN
Respondent
JUDGE: RYAN J
DATE: 20 AUGUST 2001
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 The applicant, the Repatriation Commission ("the Commission"), appeals pursuant to s 44(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) from a decision by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal ("the Tribunal") to the effect that it was not satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the respondent's incapacity caused by diverticular disease of the colon ("DDC") did not arise from a war-caused injury. In consequence, the Tribunal assessed the pension payable to Mr Swinden at 100% of the General Rate.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate