Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Employment Advocate v Williamson [2001] FCA 1164
INDUSTRIAL LAW – organisation – freedom of association – freedom not to belong to trade union – shop steward on construction site – statements to representative of contractor – no particular employee or prospective employee in contemplation – whether statements constituted advice encouragement or incitement to take action which, if taken, would have constituted taking action for a prohibited reason EVIDENCE – improperly obtained – power to admit – whether discretionary – factors to be taken into account WORDS AND PHRASES – "propose" – "does not propose to" – "do not propose to" – "advise, encourage or incite"
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 298A, 298K, 298L, 298P(3), 298U, 298V, 298X Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 55, 138 Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904-1958 (Cth) Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AB Listening Devices Act 1969 (Vic) s 4 Federal Court Rules O 4 r 6, O 10 r 1
Burgess v John Connell-Mott, Hay and Anderson Pty Ltd (1979) 37 FLR 386, cited Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 110 ALR 449, followed Hamberger v Construction Forestry Mining & Energy Union [2000] FCA 1924, considered Employment Advocate v National Union of Workers [2000] FCA 710; 100 FCR 454, considered Bennett v Milliner (1959) 1 FLR 312, considered Butera v Director of Public Prosecutions for the State of Victoria (1987) 164 CLR 180, cited Bunning v Cross (1978) 141 CLR 54, applied R v Swaffield (1998) 192 CLR 159, followed Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513, cited Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378, cited Ridgeway v R (1995) 184 CLR 19, applied Dau v Emanuele (1995) 60 FCR 270, applied Turner v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 55 FLR 180, cited Flentjar v Repatriation Commission (1997) 48 ALD 1, cited Snook v London and West Riding Investments Ltd [1967] 2 QB 786, cited Saffron v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1991) 91 ATC 4501, cited Banque Commerciale SA, en liquidation v Akhil Holdings Limited (1990) 169 CLR 279, cited Dare v Pulham (1982) 148 CLR 658, cited McCarthy v McIntyre [1999] FCA 784, cited Ting v Blanche (1993) 118 ALR 543, considered Igaki Australia Pty Ltd v Coastmine Pty Ltd (1996) 34 IPR 37, cited Cummings v Lewis (1993) 41 FCR 559, cited Metwally v University of Wollongong (1985) 60 ALR 68, cited Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1, cited Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491, cited Riseda Nominees Pty Ltd v St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne) Ltd [1988] 2 VR 70, cited Electricity Commission of New South Wales v Yates (1991) 30 NSWLR 351, cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate