Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pronko v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1165
ANNA PRONKO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 905 OF 2001 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 3 AUGUST 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 905 OF 2001
BETWEEN: ANNA PRONKO
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 3 AUGUST 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The application for review is dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 905 OF 2001
BETWEEN: ANNA PRONKO
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE: 3 AUGUST 2001
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 In this matter, I have read the material which is set out in the Court book and I have considered the submissions which have been made by the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs. Ms Pronko has been referred for legal advice and, as I understand it, she has spoken with a legal adviser. The respondent's outline of submissions in this case sets out a detailed chronology of the history and background of the application by Ms Pronko for refugee status. 2 I am satisfied that the Court does not have jurisdiction to review the determination of 14 May 2001, which appears in the Court book at 78. I am also satisfied that in so far as any application for review of the decision of 1 March 1999 is concerned, the Court has no jurisdiction because of the lapse of time. Accordingly, I have reached the conclusion that the application cannot proceed and I therefore dismiss the application for review and I order that the applicant pay the costs of the respondent. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Tamberlin.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate