Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Applicant in V346 of 2000 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1179
MIGRATION - review of a decision to refuse a protection visa - obligation of Refugee Review Tribunal to give applicant a real opportunity to give evidence and present argument - extent of obligation where Tribunal finds applicant has "concocted" certain evidence - whether Tribunal had induced applicant to believe that it accepted certain evidence - presumption that applicant has put before Tribunal all available evidence and arguments - obligation of Tribunal to give applicant particulars of information that would be the reason or part of the reason for affirming decision under review - whether that obligation extends to information about "common practices" - whether such information specifically about the applicant or another person - whether Tribunal's reasons set out its findings as to material questions of fact - effect of failure to do so - whether Tribunal has power to consider submission or other material furnished after decision has been written but before it has been handed down or given orally - whether Tribunal functus officio - discretion not to set aside decision of Tribunal notwithstanding that it involved an error of law - whether error denied applicant the possibility of a successful outcome - probative value of testimonials solicited or procured by applicant - whether no evidence or other material to justify making of decision - whether decision based on existence of a particular fact which did not exist. Migration Act 1958 ss 424A, 425(1); 430, 430A, 430B, 430D, Pt 8, 476(1), (3) and (4) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 ss 5(1) and (3) Rajamanikkam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1411 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2000] FCA 1023 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Cho (1999) 164 ALR 339 De Silva v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 765 Mohammed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 264 De Silva v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1834 Abebe v Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 162 ALR 1 Malik v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 98 FCR 291 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 469 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 90 FCR 287 Inderjit Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 73 Semunigus v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 96 FCR 533 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 74 ALJR 417 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Al Shamry [2001] FCA 919 Meadows v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 90 FCR 370 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Curragh Queensland Mining Limited v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 Guden v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 236; (2000) 58 ALD 352
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate