Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Harts Australia Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2001] FCA1188
TAXATION – income tax – appeals from objection decisions – whether deemed assessment – whether power to amend – loss transfer agreements – whether made before returns lodged – whether effective if amount transferred is "so much of the losses required which make [the income company's] taxable income nil" Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth ) ss 80G, 166A 170(2), 223, 227(3), 221AZD, 223(7), 223, 6(1), 175A, 80G(6)(c), 226J, s 226J, 170AA, 170AA(11), 170AA(1), 170AA(13), Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 14ZZO Federal Court Rules O 29 r 2
Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Ryan (2001) 201 CLR 109 mentioned East Finchley v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 90 ALR 457 at 478 applied Denver Chemical Manufacturing Co Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (NSW) (1949) 79 CLR 296 at 317 applied Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1949) 78 CLR 353 at 360 applied Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Brian Hatch Timber Co (Sales) Pty Limited (1972) 128 CLR 28 applied McAndrew v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1956) 98 CLR 263 applied Harts Australia Limited v Commission of Taxation [2000] FCA 1131 mentioned Harts Australia Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2001] FCA 761 mentioned Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 at 352 applied HARTS AUSTRALIA LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Q 204 of 1999 Q 205 of 1999 HEEREY J 28 AUGUST 2001 MELBOURNE (HEARD IN BRISBANE)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 204 OF 1999
BETWEEN: HARTS AUSTRALIA LIMITED
AND: APPLICANT
COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
RESPONDENT
Q 205 OF 1999 BETWEEN: HARTS CONSULTING PTY LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate