Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1196
MIGRATION - appeal from review of a decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming a decision of a delegate of the Minister not to grant a protection visa – scheme of procedures for the giving of information by Tribunal and of invitation by Tribunal to give information under ss 424A, 424B and 441A of Migration Act 1958 – operation of scheme – purpose and construction of s 424A – whether information was 'the reason or part of the reason for affirming the decision' – degree of assistance and application of s 430 of Act as to relevant 'reason' – distinction in circumstances between reason for preferring certain witnesses and evidence and reason for finding central factual matter – whether matters should have been specifically identified to claimant and relevance made clear – where claimant alleged that not given particulars of relevant information and that relevance of that information was not conveyed – no inconsistency between s 424A and s 441A – failure to observe procedures s 424A established – where independent basis for Tribunal decision not affected by procedural error – Tribunal decision affirmed under s 481(1) of Act notwithstanding existence of ground of review made out – not established that failure to take into account relevant considerations – Yusuf discussed. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 424A, 424B, 441A, 481(1) Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1 discussed Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v X [2001] FCA 858 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Tedella [2001] FCA 832 referred to Khan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 736 referred to Chhour v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 911 referred to Iyer v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 929 referred to Thirukkumar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 864 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Al Shamry [2001] FCA 919 discussed; not followed in part Carlos v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 301 discussed; disapproved in part Naing v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 97 FCR 336 discussed; disapproved in part Nader v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 175 ALR 548 discussed; disapproved in part Tin v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1109 approved Ahmed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 811 referred to Addo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 940 referred to Sivaran v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1740 referred to Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407 referred to Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 160 ALR 24 referred to Logenthiran v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1691 referred to Thevendram v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 182 referred to Project Blue Sky v ABA (1998) 194 CLR 355 referred to ESTHER CHRISTOBELLE NESAMALAR PAUL v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 374 of 2001 HEEREY, EMMETT and ALLSOP JJ 29 AUGUST 2001 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate