Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wood v Prentice [2001] FCA 1225 BANKRUPTCY – notice of objection to discharge from bankruptcy – where notice of objection to discharge from bankruptcy is invalid and of no force and effect – date of discharge Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)ss 77(a), 149(4), 149A(3), 149H, 149J, 149N Re Hall (1994) 14 ACSR 488 applied IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD BOYNE WOOD RE: RICHARD BOYNE WOOD EX PARTE: RICHARD BOYNE WOOD v MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE N 7180 OF 2001 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 28 AUGUST 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY 7180 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD HERBERT BOYNE WOOD
RE: RICHARD HERBERT BOYNE WOOD
BANKRUPT
EX PARTE: RICHARD HERBERT BOYNE WOOD
APPLICANT
MAXWELL WILLIAM PRENTICE
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 28 AUGUST 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT DECLARES THAT: 1. The applicant was discharged from bankruptcy on 6 September 1999 pursuant to s 149(4) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). 2. The request dated 1 February 2001 issued by the respondent under s 77(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) is invalid and of no force or effect. THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 3. The notice of objection to discharge dated 31 August 1999 be set aside. 4. The request dated 1 February 2001 issued by the respondent under s 77(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) be set aside. 5. The respondent pay the applicant's costs of and incidental to this application as agreed or taxed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY 7180 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD HERBERT BOYNE WOOD
RE: RICHARD HERBERT BOYNE WOOD
BANKRUPT
EX PARTE: RICHARD HERBERT BOYNE WOOD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate