Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cabal v The Attorney-General [2001] FCA 1234 Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 14, 27 Enfield City Corporation v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135, referred to TERESA PASINI CABAL and ORS v THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA V 150 of 2000 SPENDER, CARR, TAMBERLIN JJ MELBOURNE 29 AUGUST 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 150 OF 2000
BETWEEN: TERESA PASINI CABAL
FIRST APPLICANT
ANA MARIA CABAL PASINI
(Through her litigation guardian Teresa Pasini Cabal)
SECOND APPLICANT
TERESA CABAL PASINI
(Through her litigation guardian Teresa Pasini Cabal)
THIRD APPLICANT
SOFIA CABAL PASINI
(Through her litigation guardian Teresa Pasini Cabal)
FOURTH APPLICANT
CARLOS CABAL PASINI
(Through her litigation guardian Teresa Pasini Cabal)
FIFTH APPLICANT
AND: THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SPENDER, CARR, TAMBERLIN JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 29 AUGUST 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The application for leave be dismissed, with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 150 OF 2000
BETWEEN: TERESA PASINI CABAL
FIRST APPLICANT
AND: ANA MARIA CABAL PASINI
(Through her litigation guardian Teresa Pasini Cabal)
SECOND APPLICANT
TERESA CABAL PASINI
(Through her litigation guardian Teresa Pasini Cabal)
THIRD APPLICANT
SOFIA CABAL PASINI
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate