Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Telstra Corporation Limited (ACN 051 775 556) v Cable & Wireless Optus Limited (ACN 052 833 208) FCA [2001] 1238
V888 of 2001
TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED (ACN 051 775 556) v CABLE & WIRELESS OPTUS LIMITED (ACN 052 833 208), OPTUS NETWORKS PTY LTD (ACN 008 570 330), and OPTUS MOBILE PTY LTD (ACN 054 365 696)
RYAN J MELBOURNE 4 SEPTEMBER 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V888 of 2001
BETWEEN: TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED (ACN 051 775 556)
Applicant
AND: CABLE & WIRELESS OPTUS LIMITED (ACN 052 833 208)
First Respondent
OPTUS NETWORKS PTY LTD (ACN 008 570 330)
Second Respondent
OPTUS MOBILE PTY LTD (ACN 054 365 696)
Third Respondent
JUDGE: RYAN J
DATE OF ORDER: 4 SEPTEMBER 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS:
1. THAT UPON the applicant by its Counsel giving the usual undertaking as to damages, the respondents and each of them by their servants and agents or otherwise be restrained until the hearing and determination of this application or further order; (a) from publishing or causing to be published any advertisement to the effect that the Optus mobile telephone network has doubled or substantially increased in size over the past two years or any other period; (b) from otherwise making a representation to the effect set out in sub-paragraph (a) above; PROVIDED HOWEVER that nothing in this Order shall preclude the respondents from; (c) publishing any advertisement containing, or otherwise making, a reasonably accurate representation to the effect that the number of base stations or transponders constituting the Optus mobile telephone network has doubled or substantially increased over the last two years or any other period specified in such advertisement or representation; (d) publishing or distributing the advertisements already prepared for publication in Tennis News for September 2001, Australian Tennis Magazine for September 2001, The Broncos Magazine for September 2001 and Business Advantage for September 2001 referred to in paragraph 5(b) of the affidavit of Stuart Salier sworn 29 August 2001 and filed herein. 2. THAT the directions hearing herein be adjourned to 14 September 2001. 3. THAT liberty be reserved to any party to apply on not less than 48 hours notice in writing to the other parties. 4. THAT the costs of all parties of and incidental to the motion on notice dated 27 August 2001 be costs in the cause.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate