Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ganbat v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1371
PUREV GANBAT v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1155 of 2001 SACKVILLE J SYDNEY 24 SEPTEMBER 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1155 OF 2001
BETWEEN: PUREV GANBAT
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SACKVILLE J
DATE OF ORDER: 24 SEPTEMBER 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1155 OF 2001
BETWEEN: PUREV GANBAT
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SACKVILLE J
DATE: 24 SEPTEMBER 2001
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application for review of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") made on 12 July 2001. The Tribunal affirmed a decision of a delegate of the respondent ("the Minister") made on 11 May 2001 refusing to grant a Protection visa to the applicant. The application for review in this Court, which appears to have been prepared by the applicant himself, was filed on 3 August 2001. It does not specify any grounds available pursuant to s 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act"), stating only that the details of the grounds of review "will be sent at a later date". 2 At a directions hearing held in this matter on 6 September 2001, orders were made for the applicant to file and serve written submissions in support of his application by 18 September 2001. No such submissions were made. At the hearing today the applicant has appeared in person with the assistance of a Russian interpreter but has not put forward any oral submissions in support of his application to this Court. I should record that the applicant sought an adjournment of the proceedings. For reasons already given, I declined to grant an adjournment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate