Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
National Australia Bank Limited v Pollak [2001] FCA 1408
bankruptcy – foreign judgment debt enforced by an order of this Court – respondent and sister joint and severally liable – bank entered into agreement with respondent's sister discharging her from the debt – agreement between bank and sister amended to include clause providing for explicit reservation of the bank's rights against the respondent – validity and effectiveness of reservation clause in construing agreement – whether agreement between the bank and the sister at time initially entered into an accord executory, accord and satisfaction or accord and conditional satisfaction – construction of agreement – whether agreement a release of a single debtor releasing all other joint debtors or a covenant not to sue.
bankruptcy – Mareva injunction ordered over all the respondent's property and assets on application by the bank – whether Mareva injunction prevented respondent complying with bankruptcy notice. Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 41(3)(b) McDermott v Black (1940) 63 CLR 161, applied Thompson v Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 574, cited Osborn v McDermott [1998] 3 VR 1, applied Bartlett v Mouncey [1998] FCA 418, cited Re EWA [1901] 2 KB 624, applied Dorgal v Buckley (1996) 22 ACSR 154, followed Gardiner v Moore (No. 2) [1969] 1 QB 55, cited State of New South Wales v McCloy Hutcherson Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 489, cited Murray-Oates v JJADD Pty Ltd (1999) 76 SASR 38, cited Walker v Bowry (1924) 35 CLR 48, considered & distinguised Boscolo v Botany Council [1996] FCA 897, applied Wiltshire-Smith v Mellor Olsson (1995) 57 FCR 572, distinguished Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Stuart-Jones (2000) 45 ATR 33, cited Re Sedgwick; Ex parte Sedgwick (1888) 5 Morr 262, applied Re Solomon; Ex parte Reid (1986) 10 FCR 423, distinguished Penning v Steel Tube Supplies Pty Ltd (1988) 18 FCR 568, referred to Re Ousley; Ex parte Commissioner of Taxation (1994) 48 FCR 131, followed Re Ling; Ex parte Enrobook Pty Ltd (1996) 142 ALR 87, followed Ling v Enrobook Pty Ltd (1997) 74 FCR 19, applied NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED (ABN 12 004 044 937) v JOSEPH POLLAK N7978 of 2000 MADGWICK J 5 OCTOBER 2001 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate