Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Riverside Nursing Care Pty Ltd v Administrative Appeals Tribunal [2001] FCA 1410 Commissioner of Taxation v Beddoe (1996) 68 FCR 446 applied Geographical Indications Committee v O'Connor [2000] FCA 1877 applied Australian Postal Commission v Hayes (1989) 23 FCR 320 cited Reg v Small Claims Tribunal; Ex parte Cameron [1976] VR 427 distinguished RIVERSIDE NURSING CARE PTY LTD (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) v ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL and ANDREW PODGER (as the Secretary of the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care) V 1054 OF 2001 SUNDBERG J 5 OCTOBER 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 1054 OF 2001
BETWEEN: RIVERSIDE NURSING CARE PTY LTD
(Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement)
(ACN 005 377 453)
APPLICANT
AND: ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
ANDREW PODGER
(as the Secretary of the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care)
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SUNDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 5 OCTOBER 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The motion notice of which was filed on 1 October 2001 be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the second respondent's costs of and incidental to the motion. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 1054 OF 2001
BETWEEN: RIVERSIDE NURSING CARE PTY LTD
(Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement)
(ACN 005 377 453)
APPLICANT
AND: ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENT
ANDREW PODGER
(as the Secretary of the Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care)
SECOND RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate