Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brown v State of Western Australia [2001] FCA 1462
NATIVE TITLE - consent determination - criteria - within power and appropriate - remote desert community - connection established - variation provision pending High Court decision - deferred creation of prescribed body corporate
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 87 s 225
JIMMY BROWN ON BEHALF OF THE KIWIRRKURRA PEOPLE v THE STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA, TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED, AURORA GOLD (WA) PTY LTD
WAG 6019 OF 1998
FRENCH J
19 OCTOBER 2001
MUYIN
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAG6019 OF 1998
BETWEEN: JIMMY BROWN ON BEHALF OF THE KIWIRRKURRA PEOPLE
APPLICANT
AND: STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
FIRST RESPONDENT
TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED
SECOND RESPONDENT
AURORA GOLD (WA) PTY LTD
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER: 19 OCTOBER 2001
WHERE MADE: MUYIN
THE COURT NOTES:
A. That pursuant to section 87(1)(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) the parties have filed with this Court a Minute of Proposed Consent Determination of Native Title dated 12 September 2001 which reflects the terms of an agreement reached by the parties in relation to these proceedings.
B. That the terms of the agreement involve the making of a determination of native title in relation to the land and waters the subject of these proceedings pursuant to section 87(2) and section 94A of the Native Title Act.
C. That the Applicant has yet to establish and nominate a prescribed body corporate which will perform the functions required by either section 56 or 57 of the Native Title Act.
D. That the parties have agreed that the registered native title body corporate which will hold the Applicant's native title in trust, or will perform the functions referred to in sections 57(3) and 58 of the Native Title Act as the case may be, may seek a variation of the determination of native title in this matter (as it relates to minerals and petroleum) in accordance with subsections 13(1) and (5) of the Native Title Act in the event that the ruling in the Federal Court in Western Australia v Ward (2000) 99 FCR 316 with respect to minerals and petroleum is, in High Court Appeals Registry Nos P59 of 2000 (State of Western Australia v Ward & Ors), P62 of 2000 (Attorney General of the Northern Territory v Ward & Ors), P63 of 2000 (Ningmarmara & Ors v Northern Territory of Australia & Ors), and P67 of 2000 (Ward & Ors v Crosswalk Pty Ltd & Ors), overturned, set aside, remitted to the Federal Court or is otherwise found to be an incorrect legal ruling.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate