Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Solomon v Green [2001] FCA 1586
BANKRUPTCY – appeal against a sequestration order – application for leave to appeal against a judgment refusing to stay a sequestration order – application for leave to appeal against a judgment dismissing an application to annul the appellant's bankruptcy Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Bryant v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2000] FCA 1326 cited Wren v Mahony (1972) 126 CLR 212 cited
DAVID SOLOMON v BRUCE NOEL GREEN & ANOR N 899 of 2001 N 1281 of 2001 LEE, MOORE AND MADGWICK JJ 9 NOVEMBER 2001 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 899 of 2001
N 1281 of 2001
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: DAVID SOLOMON
APPLICANT/APPELLANT
AND: BRUCE NOEL GREEN
FIRST RESPONDENT
DENISE ANN GREEN
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGES: LEE, MOORE AND MADGWICK JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 9 NOVEMBER 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal against the judgment of Wilcox J of 5 June 2001 be dismissed.
2. Leave to appeal against the judgment of Whitlam J of 9 July 2001 be refused.
3. Leave to appeal against the judgment of Gyles J of 28 August 2001 be refused.
4. Mr David Solomon pay the respondents' costs in each matter, such costs to be costs in the bankruptcy.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 899 of 2001
N 1281 of 2001
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: DAVID SOLOMON
APPLICANT/APPELLANT
AND: BRUCE NOEL GREEN
FIRST RESPONDENT
DENISE ANN GREEN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate