Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tisdall v Health Insurance Commission [2001] FCA 1607
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for a deferment of the hearing until after the determination of an appeal to the Full Court in another matter – where determination of the appeal to the Full Court will not be determinative of this matter – application for deferment of hearing denied Grey v Health Insurance Commission [2001] FCA 1257 cited DR PETER THOMAS TISDALL v THE HEALTH INSURANCE COMMISSION AND OTHERS V 849 OF 2000 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 25 OCTOBER 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY V 849 OF 2000
BETWEEN: DR PETER THOMAS TISDALL
APPLICANT
AND: THE HEALTH INSURANCE COMMISSION & ORS
RESPONDENTS
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 25 OCTOBER 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for a deferment of the hearing be denied. 2. The hearing proceed on 3-7 December 2001. 3. The question of costs be reserved. 4. Liberty to apply on forty-eight (48) hours notice be reserved to the parties. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY V 849 OF 2000
BETWEEN: DR PETER THOMAS TISDALL
APPLICANT
AND: THE HEALTH INSURANCE COMMISSION & ORS
RESPONDENTS
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE: 25 OCTOBER 2001
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 In this matter, an application has been made by the respondents to postpone the hearing of this matter, pending an appeal to the Full Court against the decision of Finkelstein J in the matter of Grey v Health Insurance Commission [2001] FCA 1257. Having heard the submissions of the parties and having considered the history of the matter, I am not satisfied that the determination of the Grey appeal, which may be considerably delayed, will be determinative in itself of the outcome of this proceeding. Dates have been considered and set aside for the hearing of this matter and I think that it is in the interest of having a speedy resolution of the complaints or charges which have been laid against Dr Tisdall to have the matter heard as soon as possible. 2 I consider that this consideration is greater in weight than the matters of some cogency which have been put to me by Ms Hampel in favour of an adjournment. Accordingly, I reject the application for an adjournment or deferment of this proceeding pending the determination of the Full Court, and confirm that the hearing of the matter will proceed on 3-7 December 2001. 3 I will reserve any question of costs until I have heard the substance of the matter.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate