Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Repatriation Commission v Richardson [2001] FCA 1626 VETERANS' AFFAIRS – entitlements – review of pension – whether the Commission may cancel or vary a pension or allowance upon the ground that it is no longer of the view that a relevant capacity was "war-caused" – construction of subs 31(6) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) – matter not before the Commission, Board or Tribunal PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS – an opportunity to be heard Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), ss 14, 15(2), 19, 19(3), 31(6), 120, 120A, 120B, 135(1) REPATRIATION COMMISSION v IAN RICHARDSON N 1104 OF 2001 DOWSETT J 16 NOVEMBER 2001 BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1104 OF 2001
BETWEEN: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
APPLICANT
AND: IAN RICHARDSON
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 16 NOVEMBER 2001
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The matter be remitted to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for determination in accordance with law. 2. There be no order as to costs. 3. The parties have liberty to apply. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1104 OF 2001
BETWEEN: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
APPLICANT
AND: IAN RICHARDSON
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DOWSETT J
DATE: 16 NOVEMBER 2001
PLACE: BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction 1 This is an appeal by the Repatriation Commission (the "Commission") from a decision of the Veterans' Appeals Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (the "Tribunal"). To understand the somewhat complex history of this matter it is necessary to understand the decision-making process adopted when considering a claim for a pension pursuant to the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) (the "Act"), including the review process. Such a claim is made pursuant to s 14. It is investigated by the Secretary (presumably of the department administering the Act) and the outcome is submitted to the Commission for determination of the application. That decision is subject to review by the Veterans' Review Board (the "Board") pursuant to s 135(1). The Board may affirm or vary the decision or set it aside and make a decision in substitution for it. The Board's decision is subject to review by the Tribunal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate