Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Biritz v National Australia Bank Ltd [2001] FCA 1635
BANKRUPTCY – application to extend time for compliance and set aside bankruptcy notice – review of Registrar's decision to dismiss application – bankruptcy notice founded on an order as to taxation which channelled two costs orders – whether bankruptcy notice relied on more than one judgment debt – debtor claimed orders were procured by fraud – whether Court should go behind judgment debt – whether any fresh evidence of fraud – whether debtor had a counter-claim, set-off or cross demand which could not have been set up in the proceeding in which the costs order was made Bankruptcy Act 1966, s 30, s 40(1)(g), s 41 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 35A(5), s 35A(6) Federal Court Rules, O 77, r 8 Re Kwiatek and Kwiatek (1989) 21 FCR 374 referred Gray v Ball (unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Sundberg J, 24 December 1997) referred Martin v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2001] FCA 87 referred Olivieri v Stafford (1989) 24 FCR 413 referred Re Sterling; Ex parte Esanda Ltd (1980) 30 ALR 77 referred Re Briggs; Ex parte Briggs v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (WA) (1986) 12 FCR 310 referred Re Hutchins; Ex parte Wall (unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Spender J, 6 May 1998) referred Wenkart v Abignano [1999] FCA 354 referred Cummings v Raeffaele (2000) 175 ALR 107 applied Emerson v Wreckair Pty Limited (1992) 33 FCR 581 cited Kirk v Ashdown [1999] FCA 522 cited Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534 cited Ebert v The Union Trustee Company of Australia Limited (1960) 104 CLR 346 referred Re Zakrzewski (2000) 178 ALR 694 referred James v Abrahams (1981) 34 ALR 657 referred Re Brink; Ex parte The Commercial Banking Company of Sydney Ltd (1980) 44 FLR 135 referred Re James; Ex parte Carter Holt Harvey Roofing (Australia) Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 183 referred Smart v Esanda Finance Corporation Limited [2000] FCA 235 referred ERIKA BIRITZ v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED V 7079 of 2001 KENNY J 20 NOVEMBER 2001 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate