Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1669 RES JUDICATA – proceedings under Constitution s 75(v) seeking constitutional writs – proceedings remitted to the Federal Court – claim that Refugee Review Tribunal acted unreasonably in making a finding as to a jurisdictional fact – applicant failed in earlier proceedings for judicial review under Part 8 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether remitted proceedings barred by res judicata or cause of action estoppel. ANSHUN ESTOPPEL – whether applicant had unreasonably failed to raise jurisdictional unreasonableness argument – whether special circumstances present – whether applicant precluded from pursuing argument. Constitution, s 75(v) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 44 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 36, 65, 475, 476, 485, 486 Defence Forces Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 1997 CLR 611, considered. R v Connell; Ex parte Hetton Bellbird Collieries Ltd (1944) 69 CLR 407, cited. Buck v Bavone (1976) 135 CLR 110, cited. Gamaethige v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 183 ALR 59, applied. Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (1981) 147 CLR 589, applied. Gibbs v Kinna [1999] 2 VR 19, cited. Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464, cited. Macquarie Bank Ltd v National Mutual Life Association of Australia Ltd (1996) 40 NSWLR 543, cited. Henderson v Henderson (1843) 3 Hare 100, at 115; 67 ER 313, cited. Rahme v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (NSWCA, unreported, 20 December 1991), cited. Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1995) 57 FCR 287, cited. Stuart v Sanderson (2000) 100 FCR 150, distinguished. Chamberlain v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 164 CLR 502, cited. Effem Foods Pty Ltd v Trawl Industries of Australia Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 510, cited. Tanning Research Laboratories Inc v O'Brien (1990) 169 CLR 332, cited. Yat Tung Investments Co Ltd v Dao Heng Bank Ltd [1975] AC 581, cited. Ling v Commonwealth (1996) 68 FCR 180, cited. Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd (No 2) [1981] VR 81, cited. Somanader v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 178 ALR 677, followed. Trawl Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Effem Foods Pty Ltd (1992) 36 FCR 406, cited. Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135, cited. Fernando v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 436, considered. Minister of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1, cited. Arnold v National Westminster Bank Plc [1990] Ch 573, cited. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Abebe (1999) 197 CLR 510 cited. Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510, cited. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407, cited. Cam v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 84 FCR 14, cited.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate