Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
"CCC" v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1707
MIGRATION - judicial review - Refugee Review Tribunal - adequacy of reasons - alleged failure to set out findings of material fact - failure to conduct review - error of law - interpretation of "persecuted" - interpretation of "protection obligations" - particular social group - "single woman at risk" - no relevant error of law demonstrated - appeal dismissed Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476, s 430 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai (2001) 62 ALD 136 referred to Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1196 cited Thirukkumar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 864 cited Craig v State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 cited Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Ibrahim (2000) 175 CLR 585 referred to Gersten v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 855 referred to Kord v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1163 referred to "CCC" and "NNN" v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V659 OF 2001 FRENCH, WHITLAM AND KATZ JJ 6 DECEMBER 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V659 OF 2001
BETWEEN: "CCC"
FIRST APPELLANT
"NNN"
SECOND APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH, WHITLAM AND KATZ JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 6 DECEMBER 2001
WHERE MADE: PERTH (Heard in Melbourne)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate