Red Bull Australia Pty Limited v Sydneywide Distributors Pty Limited t/as Sydneywide Bottlers Australia [2001] FCA 1750

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Red Bull Australia Pty Limited v Sydneywide Distributors Pty Limited t/as Sydneywide Bottlers Australia [2001] FCA 1750

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay of final injunction pending appeal Federal Court Rules Order 51 rule 7, Order 52 rule 17 Powerflex Services Pty Ltd v Data Access Corporation (1996) 35 IPR 193 cited Starborne Holdings Pty Ltd v Radferry Pty Ltd (Cooper J, 21 May 1998, unreported) cited Windsor Smith Pty Ltd v Dr Martens Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 49 IPR 286 referred to American Cyanamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396 cited Westaflex (Aust) Pty Ltd v Wood (1990) 18 IPR 168 referred to RED BULL AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED & RED BULL GmbH v SYDNEYWIDE DISTRIBUTORS PTY LIMITED T/AS SYDNEYWIDE BOTTLERS AUSTRALIA & EMANUEL KLIMIS N 197 OF 2001 HELY J 12 DECEMBER 2001 SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 197 OF 2001

BETWEEN: RED BULL AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED

FIRST APPLICANT

RED BULL GmbH

SECOND APPLICANT

AND: SYDNEYWIDE DISTRIBUTORS PTY LIMITED T/AS SYDNEYWIDE BOTTLERS AUSTRALIA

FIRST RESPONDENT

EMANUEL KLIMIS

SECOND RESPONDENT

JUDGE: HELY J

DATE OF ORDER: 12 DECEMBER 2001

WHERE MADE: SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 197 OF 2001

BETWEEN: RED BULL AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED

FIRST APPLICANT

RED BULL GmbH

SECOND APPLICANT

AND: SYDNEYWIDE DISTRIBUTORS PTY LIMITED T/AS SYDNEYWIDE BOTTLERS AUSTRALIA

FIRST RESPONDENT

EMANUEL KLIMIS

SECOND RESPONDENT