Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kalejs v Minister for Justice & Customs [2001] FCA 1769
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for judgment and costs – whether cause of action abated by reason of applicant's death – whether statutory right transmissible – whether proceedings should proceed to judgment where applicant dies after hearing but before judgment – whether Court has power to award costs where proceedings have abated – whether executrix named in the deceased's will a proper party to make application Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B Extradition Act 1988 (Cth), s 16(1), s 19, s 21 Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic), s 29 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 43
Federal Court Rules, O 32, r 6, O 6, r 10
Pool v Pool (1804) 58 LJP 67 cited McVey v Denis (1984) 55 ALR 201 cited Bogeta Pty Ltd v Wales [1977] 1 NSWLR 139 cited Managing Director, New South Wales Technical and Further Education Commission v Fines (1993) 32 NSWLR 385 discussed Ryan v Davies Brothers Ltd (1921) 29 CLR 527 referred Harris v Lewisham and Guy's Mental Health NHS Trust [2000] 3 All ER 769 discussed Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Owens (No 2) (1953) 88 CLR 168 cited Stephenson v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1996) 68 FCR 290 discussed Rickless v United Artists Corporation [1988] QB 40 referred Barder v Calouri [1988] 1 AC 20 referred Skene v Dale [1990] VR 605 referred Cabal v United Mexican States (2001) 108 FCR 311 referred Healey v Williams (1985) 10 FCR 254 referred Hoskins v Thomson [1894] 10 WN(NSW) 121 referred Turner v London and South-Western Railway Company (1874) LR 17 Eq 561 discussed Ecroyd v Coulthard [1897] 2 Ch 554 referred Collinson v Lister (1855) 20 Beav. 355; 52 ER 639 referred Troup v Troup (1868) 16 WR 573 referred In the Marriage of Sims (1980) 50 FLR 286 discussed Foppoli v Public Trustee [1970] WAR 73 discussed Monahan v Nelson (2000) 186 DLR (4th) 193 cited Hubert v DeCamillis (1963) 41 DLR (2d) 495 cited Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 referred Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd v Boland (2000) 179 ALR 664 referred Gribbles Pathology Pty Ltd v Health Insurance Commission (1997) 80 FCR 284 referred Aussie Red Equipment Pty Ltd v Antsent Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1641 referred South East Queensland Electricity Board v Australian Telecommunications Commission (G168 of 1987, unreported decision, Pincus J, 10 February 1989) referred Kelly v Kelly and Brown [1961] P 94 referred Diamond v Diamond (1950) 51 SR(NSW) 84 referred Rysak v Rysak and Bugajaski [1967] P 179 referred Sugden v Sugden [1957] P 120 referred Henderson v O'Connell [1937] VLR 171 discussed Stead v Foster (Supreme Court of New South Wales, 4 September 1998, Butterworths Unreported Judgments BC 9804491) discussed Keena v Keena (1969) 13 FLR 445 referred Chitty's Archbold's Practice, Queen's Bench Daniell's Chancery Practice KONRADS ALFREDS KALEJS v THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE AND CUSTOMS & ANOR V 107 of 2001 KONRADS ALFREDS KALEJS v REPUBLIC OF LATVIA & ANOR V 615 of 2001 KENNY J 11 DECEMBER 2001 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate