Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hussein v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1777
MIGRATION – application for Preferential Relative (Migrant) visa – visa refused as visa applicant did not pass the character test under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) subpar 501(6)(c)(ii) – whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal afforded the applicant and the visa applicant procedural fairness – where material which was prejudicial to the visa applicant had been provided by the visa applicant herself
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 33(1), 44 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 501 McMullen v Commissioner for Superannuation (1985) 61 ALR 189 cited Donnelly v Repatriation Commission (1987) 73 ALR 350 cited Tuite v Administrative Appeals Tribunal (1993) 40 FCR 483 cited Percerep v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 483 cited Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 referred to Russell v Duke of Norfolk [1949] 1 All ER 109 cited Re Refugee Review Tribunal; ex parte AALA (2000) 75 ALJR 52 cited Re Coldham; ex parte Municipal Officers Association of Australia (1989) 84 ALR 208 at 220 applied Sinnathamby v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1986) 66 ALR 502 considered MOHAMMED HUSSEIN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N741 of 2001 BRANSON J SYDNEY 14 DECEMBER 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 741 OF 2001
BETWEEN: MOHAMMED HUSSEIN
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 14 DECEMBER 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The "appeal" be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 741 OF 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate