Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Patti v Haritou [2001] FCA 1795
INDUSTRIAL LAW – Union Rules – holding of referendum – expedited hearing – interlocutory injunction Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) Pt IX, Div 4, s 209(4) R v Joske; Ex parte Shop Distributive and Allied Employees' Association (1976) 135 CLR 194 - considered JOE PATTI v MICHAEL HARITOU, ALEX FINDLAY, RICK FOWLER, GREGORY WILLIAMS, EDWARD HARRIS, BRADLEY PARKER, MICHAEL MITTEN, STEPHEN ROWE, DAVID KIRNER No. V 636 of 2001 JUDGE: MERKEL J DATE: 21 NOVEMBER 2001 PLACE: MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY 636 OF 2001
BETWEEN: JOE PATTI
APPLICANT
AND: MICHAEL HARITOU
FIRST RESPONDENT
ALEX FINDLAY
SECOND RESPONDENT
RICK FOWLER
THIRD RESPONDENT
GREGORY WILLIAMS
FOURTH RESPONDENT
EDWARD HARRIS
FIFTH RESPONDENT
BRADLEY PARKER
SIXTH RESPONDENT
MICHAEL MITTEN
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
STEPHEN ROWE
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
DAVID KIRNER
NINTH RESPONDENT JUDGE: MERKEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 NOVEMBER 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Stephen Rowe and David Kirner be added as respondents and service upon them of court documents filed to date be dispensed with. 2. The proceeding be fixed for hearing on 10 December, 2001 at Melbourne on an estimate of 1-2 days. 3. Until the hearing and determination of the proceeding or further order of the Court, the respondents be restrained from exercising any power under Rule 42 of the Rules of the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, and in particular Rule 42(xii)(a), to agree to shorten the period therein referred to a date prior to 26 March 2005, without first giving to the applicant, through his solicitors, seven days prior written notice of the Divisional Executive's intention to agree to shorten that period. 4. Liberty be reserved to the respondents to apply, on seven days prior written notice, for the applicant to provide an undertaking as to damages in respect of the injunction granted in Order 3 above. 5. The applicant file and serve Points of Claim in respect of the claims made in the proceeding by 5.00pm on 26 November, 2001. 6. The respondents file and serve Points of Defence in response, particularising their defences to the claims made, by 5.00pm on 3 December, 2001. 7. The respondents file and serve any further affidavits upon which they seek to rely by 5.00pm on 3 December, 2001. 8. The applicant file and serve any affidavits in reply by 5.00pm on 6 December, 2001.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate