Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Optus Networks Pty Limited v Telstra Corporation Limited [2001] FCA 1798
TELECOMMUNICATIONS – Access Agreement between Optus and Telstra – whether Telstra breached its contractual obligation to provide Optus with "Access Service" – whether Optus deprived of the benefit of the clause guaranteeing the provision of "Access Service" – whether Telstra breached its barring obligations under the Access Agreement – whether Telstra breached its preselection availability obligations under the Access Agreement – whether Telstra breached its obligation not to tariff preselectable services in an anti-competitive way – whether Telstra breaches its obligation to act in good faith in relations to Optus with respect to all matters relating to or contemplated by the Access Agreement – where Telstra requires subscribers to its HomeLine Net service not to use the override facility – where physical infrastructure necessary to support the override facility still available – where only bar to use of override facility a contractual one – where subscribers elect to accept the terms of HomeLine Net. CONTRACT - whether breach of implied duty to cooperate – whether breach of duty to act in good faith. TRADE PRACTICES – misleading or deceptive conduct – where marketing of Telstra's HomeLine Net states "no override available" – where override is physically available to subscribers of HomeLine Net. WORDS & PHRASES – "Access Service" "tariffing of Preselectable Services" "anti-competitive" Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52 Telstra Corporation Limited v Optus Communications Pty Ltd (1997) 75 FCR 171 referred to Cubillo v Commonwealth (No 2) (2000) 103 FCR 1 applied Fitzwood Pty Ltd v Unique Goal Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2001] FCA 1628 referred to Futuris Corporation Limited v ERG Limited [2001] FCA 1126 referred to Vasram v AMP Life Limited [2000] FCA 1916 referred to Australis Media Holdings Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd (1998) 43 NSWLR 104 applied Re Queensland Co-operative Milling Association Ltd; Re Defiance Holdings Ltd (1976) 25 FLR 169 referred to Burger King Corporation v Hungry Jacks Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 187 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate