Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VAZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1805
MIGRATION – application to review decision of Migration Review Tribunal requiring applicant to pay $5,000 as security to ensure compliance with conditions attached to Bridging visa – "privative clause decision" – whether Tribunal erred in fixing sum required.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 74, 189, 474(2) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Karras v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Cabal v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1705 referred to Kanwar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 943 referred to Tennakoon v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 615 at [20] followed R v Hickman; Ex Parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 at 615-616 referred to R v Murray; Ex Parte Proctor (1949) 77 CLR 387 at 399-400 referred to Mitrevski v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 221 at [9] followed VAZ v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V1161 of 2001 WEINBERG J 14 DECEMBER 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V1161 OF 2001
BETWEEN: VAZ
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WEINBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 14 DECEMBER 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs, save for any costs incurred by reason of senior counsel having been retained. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V1161 OF 2001
BETWEEN: VAZ
APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate