Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Vaitaiki v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1842
TEVITA MUSIE VAITAIKI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
N 1528 OF 2001
TEVITA MUSIE VAITAIKI v DEPUTY REGISTRAR MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
N 1561 OF 2001 LINDGREN J 12 DECEMBER 2001 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1528 OF 2001
BETWEEN: TEVITA MUSIE VAITAIKI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LINDGREN J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 DECEMBER 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed as incompetent.
2. The applicant pay one half of the respondent's costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1561 OF 2001
BETWEEN: TEVITA MUSIE VAITAIKI
APPLICANT
AND: DEPUTY REGISTRAR MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: LINDGREN J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 DECEMBER 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed as incompetent. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1528 OF 2001
BETWEEN: TEVITA MUSIE VAITAIKI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate