Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Akpata v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1868 MIGRATION – appeal from a decision of a single Judge affirming the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal to refuse the appellant's protection visas – whether the appellants had a well-founded fear of persecution – application of the "real chance" test – the appellants' previous experience of persecution
MIGRATION – bias – reasonable apprehension of bias – whether Judge should be disqualified because of previous exposure to information in the media concerning the appellant Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 476 Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379, referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559, applied Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 75 ALJR 277, applied STEPHEN AKPATA, FORTRESS AKPATA AND PRECIOUS AKPATA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS S 50 OF 2001 GRAY, DOWSETT AND STONE JJ 21 DECEMBER 2001 SYDNEY (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 50 OF 2001
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: STEPHEN OGHO AKPATA
FIRST APPELLANT
FORTRESS AKPATA
SECOND APPELLANT
PRECIOUS AKPATA
THIRD APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: GRAY, DOWSETT & STONE JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 21 DECEMBER 2001
PLACE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellants pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 50 OF 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate