Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mohamed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 4
MIGRATION – protection visa – review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal ("Tribunal") – child of applicant not included in application – whether rights of child required to be considered in determining application – whether Convention on the Rights of the Child gives rise to justiciable controversy – legitimate expectations of child of applicant – no reviewable error demonstrated Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2), 476(2) Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292 referred to Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273 referred to Victoria v Commonwealth (1996) 187 CLR 416 referred to Re East; Ex parte Quoc Phu Nguyen (1998) 159 ALR 108 referred to Minogue v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1999) 84 FCR 438 followed Minogue v Williams [2000] FCA 125 followed Tuitupou v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 197 followed Sikahele v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 1453 referred to MAHROUSSA MOHAMED v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1295 of 2001 STONE J 22 JANUARY 2002 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1295 OF 2001
BETWEEN: MAHROUSSA MOHAMED
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 22 JANUARY 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application be dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1295 OF 2001
BETWEEN: MAHROUSSA MOHAMED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate