Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Li v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs[2002] FCA 64
GUANG LI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1170 OF 2001
STONE J 5 FEBRUARY 2002 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1170 OF 2001
BETWEEN: GUANG LI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 5 FEBRUARY 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed; 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1170 OF 2001
BETWEEN: GUANG LI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE: 5 FEBRUARY 2002
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 The applicant is a citizen of the People's Republic of China who arrived in Australia on 6 January 2000. He applied for a protection visa on 3 February 2000. His application was refused by a delegate of the respondent Minister on 12 February 2000. The Refugee Review Tribunal ("Tribunal") affirmed that decision on 12 July 2001. On 7 August 2001, the applicant commenced proceedings in this Court seeking a review of the Tribunal's decision, under Pt 8 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act").
Protection visa 2 Section 36(2) of the Act provides that a criterion for a protection visa is that the applicant is a non-citizen of Australia to whom Australia has protection obligations under the Refugees Convention as amended by the Refugees Protocol ("Convention"). References to provisions of the Act are to those provisions as they were before the amendments commencing on 2 October 2001. Article 1A(2) of the Convention defines a refugee as a person who has a "well-founded fear of being persecuted" for a reason specified in the Convention.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate