Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
W231/01A v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 80
MIGRATION – refusal to grant protection visas – Tribunal affirming decision of respondent not to grant visas – applicant in detention – applicant did all that was possible to lodge notice of appeal within time – Australian corrections management failed to lodge notice of appeal given to it – notice of appeal lodged out of time – whether Court has jurisdiction to hear the application – whether statute abrogated fundamental freedom of right of access to the courts – whether that fundamental freedom included right of unimpeded communication with the courts – whether deemed compliance with Act – whether respondent in position of conflict
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 256, 476(1), 478, 478(1)(b) Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 36 Summary Jurisdiction Act 1857 (UK) s 2
Finn, Fiduciary Obligations (Law Book Company, 1977) ch 15 and ch 21
Nirmalan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 672 followed Hong v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1998) 82 FCR 469 referred to Oguzhan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 99 FCR 285 referred to Kucuk v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 535 referred to Abidin v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 842 referred to Salehi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 995 referred to Victorian Council for Civil Liberties Incorporated v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2001) 182 ALR 617 cited Minister for Lands and Forests v McPherson (1991) 22 NSWLR 687 cited Raymond v Honey [1982] 1 All ER 756 cited Chester v Bateson [1920] 1 QB 829 cited R & W Paul Ltd v Wheat Commission [1936] 2 All ER 1243, [1937] AC 139 cited Re Boaler [1915] 1 KB 21 cited Reg v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Anderson [1984] QB 778 cited Leech v Secretary of State for Scotland [1991] SLT 910 cited Reg v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Leech [1994] QB 198 cited Mabo & Ors v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 referred to Wills & Sons v McSherry [1913] 1 KB 20 cited Keir v Morris (1963) 4 FLR 230 referred to Bropho v Western Australia [1990] 171 CLR 1 cited Potter v Minahan [1908] 7 CLR 277 cited Clay v Clay (2001) 202 CLR 410 cited Cubillo v Commonwealth (2000) 174 ALR 97 cited Le v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1994) 53 FCR 27 referred to W231/01A v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS W231 of 2001 RD NICHOLSON J 12 FEBRUARY 2002 PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate