Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bozanich v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 81 MIGRATION – extended eligibility (temporary) (class TK subclass 820) spouse visa – whether Migration Review Tribunal in error of law in affirming decision of delegate refusing visa – whether Tribunal in error of law in concluding that there were no compelling reasons for not applying schedule 3 criteria Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 31, 31(3), 359A, 366A, 424A, 476, 476(1)(a), 476(1)(d) and (g), 476(1)(e), 476(3)(c), 476(3)(d) and (e) Migration Regulations 1994 regs 2.01, 2.02, 2.03 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Al Shamry [2001] FCA 919 referred to MARIJA BOZANICH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS W257 of 2001 RD NICHOLSON J 12 FEBRUARY 2002 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W257 of 2001
BETWEEN: MARIJA BOZANICH
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: RD NICHOLSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 12 FEBRUARY 2002
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W257 of 2001
BETWEEN: MARIJA BOZANICH
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: RD NICHOLSON J
DATE: 12 FEBRUARY 2002
PLACE: PERTH
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 The applicant brings an application to review a decision of the Migration Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") given on 29 May 2001. The decision affirmed a decision by a delegate of the respondent refusing to the applicant an Extended Eligibility (Temporary) (Class TK subclass 820) spouse) visa ("820 spouse visa"). The application is brought pursuant to s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act"). 2 The application for the 820 spouse visa was lodged with the Department of Immigration & Multicultural Affairs ("DIMA") on 25 June 1998. It was supported by the applicant's husband as her nominator.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate