Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wenzel v Australian Stock Exchange Ltd [2002] FCA 95
CONTRACTS ‑ Offer and acceptance ‑ Whether application for admission to Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) gave rise to an agreement by ASX to process application in accordance with its Articles ‑ Consideration ‑ Whether implied term that application would be processed with reasonable promptness, in a bona fide manner, consistently with duty of fair dealing, without taking into account irrelevant considerations, and without giving effect to ulterior purposes. COMPANY LAW ‑ Applicant applies to join ASX ‑ Consideration of membership applications deferred pending decision relating to demutualisation of ASX ‑ Demutualisation ‑ Pre‑demutualisation members entitled to shares in demutualised ASX ‑ Deferred applicants admitted to membership with no entitlement to shares ‑ Whether applicant entitled to full membership and distribution of shares ‑ Whether applicant oppressed. TRADE PRACTICES ‑ Misleading and deceptive conduct ‑ Silence as conduct ‑ Unconscionable conduct. EQUITY ‑ Equity looks on that as done which ought to be done ‑ Contract ‑ Application of maxim dependent on specific enforceability.
Corporations Law Part 71A Corporations Act 2001 s 232 Trade Practices Act 1974 ss 51AA, 52
Vroom BV v Fosters Brewing Group Ltd [1994] 2 VR 32 cited Woodford v Smith [1970] 1 WLR 806 considered Baker v Liberal Party of Australia (SA Division) (1997) 68 SASR 366 considered Hughes Aircraft Systems International v Airservices Australia (1997) 76 FCR 151 applied Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (1954) 92 CLR 424 considered Freeman v Cooke (1848) 2 Ex 654 cited Von Hatzfeldt‑Wildenburg v Alexander [1912] 1 Ch 284 cited Campbell v Rofe (1932) 48 CLR 258 considered Strong v J Brough & Son (Strathfield) Pty Ltd (1991) 5 ACSR 296 cited Re Interchase Corporation (1992) 111 ALR 561 cited Service Station Association Ltd v Berg Bennett & Associates Pty Ltd (1993) 45 FCR 84 cited Garry Rogers Motors (Aust) Pty Ltd v Subaru (Aust) Pty Ltd (1999) ATPR 41‑703 applied Metropolitan Life Insurance Co v RJR Nabisco Inc (1989) 716 F Supp 1504 cited Burger King Corp v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd (unreported, NSWCA 21 June 2001) cited Re RAC Motoring Services Ltd [2001] 1 BCLC 307 considered Re NRMA Ltd (2000) 33 ACSR 595 considered Spargos Mining NL (1990) 8 ACLC 1,218 distinguished Wayde v New South Wales Rugby League (1985) 180 CLR 459 applied Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Simply No‑Knead (Franchising) Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 253 cited Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1982) 151 CLR 447 cited Stern v McArthur (1988) 165 CLR 489 cited Re Anstis (1886) 31 Ch D 596 cited De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd v British South Africa Co [1912] AC 52 cited Frederick v Frederick (1721) 1 Str 455; 93 ER 632 cited PETER BRUCE WENZEL v AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE LTD VG 545 OF 1998 GRAEME VINCENT ROUGH v AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE LTD VG 546 OF 1998 BRYAN FRANCIS MADDEN v AUSTRALIAN STOCK EXCHANGE LTD VG 551 OF 1998 SUNDBERG J 15 FEBRUARY 2002 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate