Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Knight v Repatriation Commission [2002] FCA 103
VETERANS' AFFAIRS – veterans' entitlements – lumbar spondylosis – whether a war-caused disease – Tribunal found material pointed to no reasonable hypothesis – whether Tribunal applied legislation correctly – application of statement of principles WORDS AND PHRASES – "acute symptoms and signs of pain, tenderness, and altered mobility or range of movement"
Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 6A, 9, 119, 120, 120A, 196B Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44(1)
Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82 applied Harris v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 873 (2000) 31 AAR 270 considered Connors v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 783 (2000) 59 ALD 61 considered Repatriation Commission v Bey (1997) 79 FCR 364 applied Kumar v Immigration Review Tribunal (1992) 36 FCR 544 referred to Repatriation Commission v Flentjar (1997) 47 ALR 67 referred to Thanh Phat Ma v Billings (1997) 71 FCR 431 referred to Grundman v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 892 referred to Harris v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 1687 (2000) 32 AAR 84 applied Arnott v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 262 (2001) 32 AAR 445 applied Byrnes v Repatriation Commission (1993) 177 CLR 564 referred to Bushell v Repatriation Commission (1992) 175 CLR 408 referred to Repatriation Commission v Bey (1997) 79 FCR 364 referred to Repatriation Commission v Keeley [2000] FCA 532 (2000) 98 FCR 108 considered Repatriation Commission v Gorton [2001] FCA 1194 (2001) 33 AAR 370 considered LESLIE ROY KNIGHT v REPATRIATION COMMISSION V 673 of 2000 GRAY J 15 FEBRUARY 2002 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 673 of 2000
ON APPEAL FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
BETWEEN: LESLIE ROY KNIGHT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate