Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Britten v State of Western Australia (No 2) [2002] FCA 163 NATIVE TITLE – application for determination – joinder of parties – two applications with respect to overlapping areas of land – second application also overlapped with a third application and did not identify clearly those claimed to be native title holders – court expert reported on identity of those claimed to be native title holders in second application – whether those identified should be added as respondents to the first application – possibility of some being members of group on whose behalf first application brought – whether question of native title in overlapping area should be determined in first application
Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 61, 67, 68 Britten v State of Western Australia [2001] FCA 1256 JACK BRITTEN & ORS v STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS WAG 6007 of 1998 TANBA BANKS v STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & ORS WAG 6199 of 1998 GRAY J 1 MARCH 2002 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY WAG 6007 of 1998
BETWEEN: JACK BRITTEN
FIRST APPLICANT
SHIRLEY DRILL
SECOND APPLICANT
PHYLLIS GALLAGHER
THIRD APPLICANT
BERNARD STRETCH
FOURTH APPLICANT
HECTOR CHUNDA
FIFTH APPLICANT
AND: STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
FIRST RESPONDENT
NATIONAL PARKS AND NATURE CONSERVATION AUTHORITY
SECOND RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR WATER RESOURCES
THIRD RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR MINES
FOURTH RESPONDENT
MINISTER FOR LANDS
FIFTH RESPONDENT
SHIRE OF HALLS CREEK
SIXTH RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate