Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Videla v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 233
MIGRATION – application for review of decision of Migration Review Tribunal – application for Family Residence class AO visa, subclass 806 – whether applicant's sister's marital problems constitute serious circumstance resulting in permanent or long term need for assistance
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476
Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Cohen [2001] 177 ALR 473 at 480 referred to Rahman v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1277 at [29] referred to Azzi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 24 at [102-113] referred to Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend (1986) 162 CLR 24 at 39 referred to JOSE PATRICIO SAN MARTIN VIDELA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V757 of 2001 WEINBERG J 6 MARCH 2002 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 757 OF 2001
BETWEEN: JOSE PATRICIO SAN MARTIN VIDELA
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MELBOURNE
DATE OF ORDER: 6 MARCH 2002
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The application be dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 757 OF 2001
BETWEEN: JOSE PATRICIO SAN MARTIN VIDELA
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MELBOURNE
DATE: 6 MARCH 2002
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act") for review of a decision of the Migration Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") which affirmed a decision of a delegate of the respondent Minister that the applicant was not entitled to the grant of a what was known as a Family Residence class AO visa, subclass 806. The applicant was legally represented when this application was originally filed, on 27 July 2001. However, he has been unrepresented since about October of last year.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate