Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ahvazi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 279
MIGRATION – Protection Visa – application for review of decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal – whether failure by the Tribunal to address an alternative way on which the applicant could put his case was an error of law where applicant did not raise the alternate case squarely – whether the Tribunal has an obligation to make an applicant's case – whether evidence raised the applicant's fear of persecution in Iran for imputed religious beliefs derived from his friendship with people of the Baha'i faith – no error of law found. Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 Art 1A(2) Migration Act 1958 s 476(1)
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1 considered Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 94 FCR 28 followed Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 90 FCR 287 cited Satheeskumar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1285 cited AHVAZI V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS S165 OF 2001 HILL J 19 MARCH 2002 SYDNEY (HEARD IN ADELAIDE) (HEARD IN PART VIA VIDEO LINK)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY S165 OF 2001
BETWEEN: MOHAMMAD TORKAMANI AHVAZI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 19 MARCH 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN ADELAIDE) (HEARD IN PART VIA VIDEO LINK)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the Minister's costs.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY S165 OF 2001
BETWEEN: MOHAMMAD TORKAMANI AHVAZI
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate