Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 281 MIGRATION – whether Tribunal was in error – whether mistake in findings constituted an error – whether an error of law – effect of privative clause – jurisdictional error – operation of the Hickman principle – jurisdiction of the Federal Court – consideration of jurisdictional error at general law and in statute
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 65, 474, 475A, 476, 477 and 478 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 discussed Darling Casino Ltd v New South Wales Casino Control Authority (1997) 191 CLR 602 discussed Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 168 referred to Walton v Philip Ruddock Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1839 discussed R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 applied The King v Murray; Ex parte Proctor (1949) 77 CLR 387 discussed Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1 discussed Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 147 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai (2001) 106 FCR 426 cited NABE v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1498 of 2001 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 19 MARCH 2002
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1498 OF 2001
BETWEEN: NABE
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 19 MARCH 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate