Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
von Arnim v Group 4 Correctional Services Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 310
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – Federal Court of Australia – federal jurisdiction – application to vindicate right under s 47 of State Corrections Act by person detained under Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – jurisdiction of Federal Court to entertain application COSTS – indemnity costs – principles applicable to award of costs on an indemnity basis – whether respondent entitled to award on indemnity costs basis Extradition Act 1988 (Cth), s 19(9), s 53 Corrections Act 1986 (Vic), s 47 Judiciary Act, s 39B(1A)(c) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 43 Commonwealth Constitution, s 76 Bertran v Vanstone (1999) 94 FCR 404 cited Transport Workers' Union v Lee (1998) 84 FCR 60 followed Re Judiciary and Navigation Acts (1921) 29 CLR 257 applied Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 applied Croome v Tasmania (1997) 191 CLR 119 applied Abebe v Commonwealth of Australia (1999) 197 CLR 510 applied R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex Parte Barrett (1945) 70 CLR 141 applied LNC Industries Ltd v BMW (Australia) Limited (1983) 151 CLR 573 cited Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51 cited Felton v Mulligan (1971) 124 CLR 367 applied R v Hughes (2000) 202 CLR 535 considered Pedersen v Young (1964) 110 CLR 162 cited Maguire v Simpson (1977) 139 CLR 362 cited The Commonwealth of Australia v Mewett (1997) 191 CLR 471 cited Northern Territory v GPAO (1999) 196 CLR 553 cited Austral Pacific Group Limited (in liquidation) v Airservices Australia (2000) 203 CLR 136 cited Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd (2001) 177 ALR 329 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Limited (1993) 46 FCR 225 considered Helljay Investments Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 166 ALR 302 cited EMI Records Ltd v Ian Cameron Wallace Ltd [1983] Ch 59 cited DR ULRICH CHRISTOPH EBERHARD FREIHERR VON ARNIM v GROUP 4 CORRECTIONAL SERVICES PTY LTD (ACN 050 069 255) V 154 of 2001 KENNY J 20 MARCH 2002 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate