Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAAT v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 332 MIGRATION – Phillipino citizen claims to fear persecution by reason of her views concerning unions – whether the RRT addressed the correct issue – whether the RRT was bound to ask the applicant further questions – whether the RRT denied the applicant procedural fairness by failing to warn her that her answers did not seem to make out her case. Constitution, s 75(v) Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, art 1A(2) Judiciary Act, s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 414, 420(2)(b), 474 Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act 2001 (Cth) R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598, cited. Walton v Ruddock [2001] FCA 1839, cited. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 179 ALR 238, cited. Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte HB (2001) 179 ALR 513, cited. Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 167, cited. Re Refugee Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82, cited. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321, cited. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Epeabaka (1999) 84 FCR 411, cited. Powley v Crimes Compensation Tribunal (1996) 11 VAR 146, cited. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam (1999) 93 FCR 220, followed. Saliba v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1998) 89 FCR 38, distinguished. Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 94 FCR 28, distinguished. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Sarrazola (No 2) (2001) 107 FCR 184, cited. Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1802, distinguished. Luu v Renevier (1989) 91 ALR 39, distinguished. Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155, distinguished. Kola v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 265, cited. Abebe v The Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510, cited. NAAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 263, cited. NAAT v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1454 of 2001 SACKVILLE J SYDNEY 27 MARCH 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate