Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NABM of 2001 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 335 MIGRATION – application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming a decision of Minister's delegate not to grant a protection visa – whether Tribunal committed reviewable error of law in failing to consider previous determinations of the Tribunal – where applicant Ukraine citizen of Greek Catholic faith – no reviewable error disclosed Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act 2001 (Cth) Migration Legislation Amendment (Procedural Fairness) Bill 2002 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Abebe v Commonwealth (1999) 197 CLR 510 cited Ahamed v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1325 cited Darling Casino Ltd v NSW Casino Control Authority (1997) 191 CLR 602 cited Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 168 cited Foxtel Management Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2000) 173 ALR 362 cited Grain Elevators Board (Vic) v Dunmunkle Corporation (1946) 73 CLR 70 cited Luu v Renevier (1989) 91 ALR 39 cited Luu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1875 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Miah (2001) 75 ALJR 889 cons NAAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 263 followed NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 281 cited NACA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 63 cited Prasad v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155 followed R v Commonwealth Rent Controller; Ex parte National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Ltd (1947) 75 CLR 361 cited R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 followed Rahman v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1277 cons Randhawa v MILGEA (1994) 52 FCR 437 cons Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2001) 204 CLR 82 cons SAAA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 101 cons SBBM v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 183 cons SZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (2000) 101 FCR 342 followed Vanmeld Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council (1999) 46 NSWLR 78 cited Walton v Philip Ruddock, The Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1839 cons R v Coldham; Ex parte Australian Workers' Union (1983) 153 CLR 415 cited O'Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 232 cited NABM OF 2001 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS NO. N 1515 OF 2001 BEAUMONT J 26 MARCH 2002 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate