Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Verth v Repatriation Commission [2002] FCA 375
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from a decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal affirming a decision of Repatriation Commission – where applicant claims to have qualifying service as defined in s 7A(1) of Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) – whether the applicant had rendered service as a member of another Commonwealth country's defence force during a period of hostilities – whether the applicant incurred danger from hostile forces of the enemy WORDS AND PHRASES – "incurred danger"
Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) s 7A(1) Repatriation Commission v Thompson (1993) 44 FCR 20 at 23 applied WALTER VERTH v REPATRIATION COMMISSION T 28 OF 2001 HEEREY J 4 APRIL 2002 MELBOURNE (HEARD IN HOBART)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
TASMANIA DISTRICT REGISTRY T 28 OF 2001
BETWEEN: WALTER VERTH
APPLICANT
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HEEREY J
DATE OF ORDER: 4 APRIL 2002
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE (HEARD IN HOBART)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs, including reserved costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
TASMANIA DISTRICT REGISTRY T 28 OF 2001
BETWEEN: WALTER VERTH
APPLICANT
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HEEREY J
DATE: 4 APRIL 2002
PLACE: MELBOURNE (HEARD IN HOBART)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 The applicant appeals from a decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (the Tribunal) given on 15 August 2001 affirming a decision of a delegate of the respondent Commission that the applicant does not have qualifying service as defined in s 7A(1) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) (the Act). 2 Relevantly for present purposes, the question was whether the applicant had rendered service as a member of another Commonwealth country's defence force during a period of hostilities "…in an area outside that country, at a time when the person incurred danger from hostile forces of the enemy in that area…" within the meaning of s 7A(1)(b)(i) of the Act. The applicant was a member of the Royal Air Force and served in Sarawak during the period of Indonesian Confrontation. The issue before the Tribunal was whether at that time he "incurred danger from hostile forces of the enemy".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate