Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NAAV of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 443
MIGRATION LAW – protection visa – whether the Refugee Review Tribunal committed jurisdictional error – whether the Tribunal took into account an irrelevant consideration by considering the return of the applicants to India after travelling overseas – whether the Minister failed to accord procedural fairness or natural justice in dealing with a sur place claim – no error found.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2), 474 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 Art 1A(2)
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Re; Ex parte Miah (2001) 179 ALR 238 discussed NAAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 263 approved Brooks v the Commissioner of Taxation 100 FCR 117 referred to Ratumaiwai v Minister of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 311 cited APPLICANT NAAV OF 2002, APPLICANT NAAW OF 2002, APPLICANT NAAX OF 2002 and APPLICANT NAAY OF 2002 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 36 OF 2002 HILL J 10 APRIL 2002 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 36 OF 2002
BETWEEN: APPLICANT NAAV OF 2002
FIRST APPLICANT
APPLICANT NAAW OF 2002
SECOND APPLICANT
APPLICANT NAAX OF 2002
THIRD APPLICANT
APPLICANT NAAY OF 2002
FOURTH APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 APRIL 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. the application be dismissed. 2. the applicant pay the Minister's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate