Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Takitaki v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 445 MIGRATION LAW - application under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) for relief by way of prerogative writ in relation to two decisions of the Migration Review Tribunal refusing applications for bridging visas – whether error made by Tribunal in the first decision fell outside the operation of privative clause – whether the Tribunal made an error of law in the second decision. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 59, 474(1) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 followed Darling Casino Limited v New South Wales Casino Control Authority (1997) 191 CLR 602 cited NAAX v The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 263 cited NABE v The Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 381 cited
SIAATOUTAI TAKITAKI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1649 OF 2001 SIAATOUTAI TAKITAKI V MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N 181 OF 2002 HILL J 9 APRIL 2002 SYDNEY IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA GENERAL DISTRIBUTION
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1649 OF 2001
BETWEEN: SIAATOUTAI TAKITAKI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HILL J
DATE OF ORDER: 9 APRIL 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 181 OF 2002
BETWEEN: SIAATOUTAI TAKITAKI
APPLICANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate