Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rerukana v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 472 MIGRATION – review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – refusal to grant protection visa – applicant claimed persecution because of association with provision of arms to Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam – error of law – whether jurisdictional error – whether Tribunal identified wrong issue – whether Tribunal asked wrong question – whether Tribunal erred in law with respect to what constitutes persecution – whether Tribunal failed to apply "what if I am wrong test". Migration Act 1958 (Cth): ss 476(1)(b), (c) & (e) Craig v State of South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 180 ALR 1 referred to Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [2000] FCA 1478 applied Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 applied PATTIDORACHANDIMARASIKARERUKANAvMINISTERFORIMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 889 of 2001 GOLDBERG J 17 APRIL 2002 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 889 of 2001
BETWEEN: PATTIDORA CHANDIMA RASIKA RERUKANA
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 17 APRIL 2002
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 889 of 2001
BETWEEN: PATTIDORA CHANDIMA RASIKA RERUKANA
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate