Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NACA v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 551 MIGRATION – application for review – whether RRT took into account irrelevant material – whether RRT neglected to take into account relevant material – whether RRT erred in finding that the applicant would not be committed to openly practice Evangelical Christianity – whether breach of procedural fairness – whether RRT should have inquired into previous applications – failure to mention claims in application for visa – whether Secretary of Department had failed to provide the RRT with relevant material – whether breach of s 418(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)invalidates the decision of the RRT – whether s 474 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) applies – specificity of notice under s 78B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 418(3), 474 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 78B Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 cited Montreal Street Railway Co v Normandin [1917] AC 170 cited Posner v Collector for Inter-State Destitute Persons (Vic) (1946) 74 CLR 461 cited Owners of the Ship "Shin Kobe Maru" v Empire Shipping Co Inc (1994) 120 ALR 12 cited F Hutley, "TheCult of Nullification in English Law"(1978) 52 ALJ 8 Aronson and Dyer, Judicial Review of Administrative Action 2nd ed. 2000 NACA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS N89 OF 2002 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 10 MAY 2002
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N89 OF 2002
BETWEEN: NACA
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 MAY 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application for review is dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate