Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gambro Pty Ltd v Fresenius Medical Care Australia Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 581
PRACTICE and PROCEDURE – application seeking further discovery of documents in the possession of the parent company and related entities of the respondent outside Australia – whether documents sought are relevant – likely existence of documents – likelihood that parent company and related entities outside Australia would comply with request by the respondent for documents sought for discovery – whether hardship or oppression on respondent Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23 Burgundy Royale Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (unreported, Federal Court of Australia, Foster J, 21 February 1990) cited Sabre Corporation Pty Ltd v Russ Kalvin's Hair Care Company (1993) 46 FCR 428 followed F Hoffmann La-Roche A G v Chiron Corporation (2000) 171 ALR 295 referred to Unilever PLC v Chefaro Proprietaries Ltd [1994] FSR 135 referred to Molnlycke v Procter & Gamble (No 5) [1994] RPC 49 cited Aetna Pacific Security Ltd v HongKong Bank of Australia Ltd (unreported , Supreme Court of New South Wales, Giles J, 29 April 1993) referred to GAMBRO PTY LIMITED and GAMBRO LUNDIA AB v FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED NG 474 of 1997 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 10 MAY 2002
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 474 OF 1997
BETWEEN: GAMBRO PTY LIMITED
(ACN 001 288 491)
FIRST APPLICANT
GAMBRO LUNDIA AB
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (ACN 067 557 877)
RESPONDENT
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
(ACN 067 557 877)
CROSS-CLAIMANT
GAMBRO PTY LIMITED
FIRST CROSS RESPONDENT
GAMBRO LUNDIA AB
SECOND CROSS-RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate