Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ayoub v Bradana Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 597 COSTS – whether delay caused by party's conduct – whether motion was necessitated by conduct of party MALCOLM HANNA AYOUB v BRADANA PTY LTD, UNITED PETROLEUM PTY LTD AND VIEWLINK PTY LTD N1466 OF 2001 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 10 MAY 2002
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1466 OF 2001
BETWEEN: MALCOLM HANNA AYOUB
APPLICANT
AND: BRADANA PTY LTD (ACN 074 937 956)
FIRST RESPONDENT
UNITED PETROLEUM PTY LTD (ACN 085 779 255)
SECOND RESPONDENT
VIEWLINK PTY LTD (ACN 062 233 210)
THIRD RESPONDENT
BRADANA PTY LTD (ACN 074 937 956)
FIRST CROSS-CLAIMANT
UNITED PETROLEUM PTY LTD (ACN 085 779 255)
SECOND CROSS-CLAIMANT
VIEWLINK PTY LTD (ACN 062 233 210)
THIRD CROSS-CLAIMANT
MALCOLM HANNA AYOUB
CROSS-RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 MAY 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Orders are made in accordance with the draft Consent Orders submitted by the parties annexed to these reasons. 2. Costs in relation to each Notice of Motion should be awarded in accordance with the outcome of the proceeding. 3. The matter is stood over for further directions on 26 July 2002 at 9.30 am. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1466 OF 2001
BETWEEN: MALCOLM HANNA AYOUB
APPLICANT
AND: BRADANA PTY LTD (ACN 074 937 956)
FIRST RESPONDENT
UNITED PETROLEUM PTY LTD (ACN 085 779 255)
SECOND RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate