Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Huo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 617
MIGRATION – unsuccessful application for Business (Long Stay) subclass 457 visa – two successive corporate sponsorship applications relating to visa applicant refused – pending application to Migration Review Tribunal for review of Departmental decision to reject later of the two sponsorship applications – Tribunal rejected visa application by reason of absence of approved sponsorship relating to visa applicant – whether Tribunal should have awaited outcome of review of that later sponsorship application before determining the visa application – whether denial of natural justice by Tribunal determining visa application, or breach on its part of statutory obligations and conditions – whether jurisdictional error – whether privative clause of Migration Act effective to deny Court's jurisdiction in the proceedings. Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 359A, 360, 430, 474 Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act 2001 (Cth) Schedule 1, Clause 8(2) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Schedule 2, sub-clauses 457.223(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9), Regulations 1.20D, 1.20G Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Capitly [1999] FCA 193 distinguished Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2000] FCA 789 distinguished Bellaiche v Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1998) 51 ALD 356 distinguished Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 94 FCR 28 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai (2001) 106 FCR 426 referred to Zhao v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1523 considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 75 ALJR 1105 referred to R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox and Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598 considered R v Murray; Ex parte Proctor (1949) 77 CLR 387 referred to Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 74 ALJR 405 referred to Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135 referred to Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 203 CLR 194 referred to Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte HB (2001) 179 ALR 513 referred to R v Coldham; Ex parte Australian Workers Union (1983) 153 CLR 415 approved NAAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 263 followed NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 281 followed Ratumaiwai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 311 followed NABM v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 335 followed Wang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 477 followed Park v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 346 approved SHU QIANG HUO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 1406 OF 2001 CONTI J 15 MAY 2002 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate