Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NADM v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs FCA [2002] 642 NADM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N156 of 2002 WILCOX J 14 MAY 2002 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N156 of 2002
BETWEEN: NADM
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE OF ORDER: 14 MAY 2002
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the costs of the respondent. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N156 of 2002
BETWEEN: NADM
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WILCOX J
DATE: 14 MAY 2002
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT WILCOX J: 1 This matter was before the Court for directions on 12 April last. On that occasion the applicant attended with an interpreter. The matter was fixed for hearing at 2.15 today. I explained to the applicant that the matter would definitely proceed at that time and that he must be here. He has not attended. An interpreter is here but not the applicant. Nothing has been heard from the applicant either by the solicitors for the respondent or by the Court. I can only assume he has lost interest in the matter. 2 Mr Justin Smith, counsel for the respondent, asks that in the circumstances I make an order dismissing the application for review with costs. I think this is the appropriate course for me to take. Accordingly, I so order. I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Wilcox.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate