Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SDAN v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs
[2002] FCA 710
MIGRATION – protection visa – appeal from decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming decision of a delegate of the respondent not to grant a protection visa to the applicant – whether RRT failed to consider relevant material in a way that affected its exercise of power – meaning of persecution in context of s 91R of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether the Court should first examine the merits of the applicant's case before it considers the privative clause issue. Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), s 39B, s 474
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 91R
Yusuf v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 180 ALR 1, applied
Paul v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 64 ALD 289, referred to
Alam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 630, referred to
Algama v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 1884, referred to
SBAB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 161, applied
SDAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS S 88 OF 2002 MARSHALL J ADELAIDE 31 MAY 2002
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 88 OF 2002
BETWEEN: SDAN
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MARSHALL
DATE OF ORDER: 31 MAY 2002
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 88 OF 2002
BETWEEN: SDAN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate